It all started in 2014
Stuck with an outdated curriculum and and a lack of stimulating students projects in aerospace, we decided to bring something truly unique and original to our university life...
|
Stuck with an outdated curriculum and and a lack of stimulating students projects in aerospace, we decided to bring something truly unique and original to our university life...
|
01 |
Design SpecificationAt the beginning of each programme, we set out a list of specifications that the engine should meet. These include the type of engine, the bypass ratio, ranges for the number of stages in the compressor and turbine, as well as ranges for the maximum theoretical and operating conditions. We also set out some key physical limitations, such as the approximate diameter of the core at the HPC/PC, to act as a starting point for the scale of the design.
|
02 |
Theoretical ModellingThe first step for most teams includes a 'textbook' approach to theoretically modelling the engine and the various components. During this stage, the number of stages, the blade geometries and performance parameters are calculated, which is crucial in justifying why a component has been designed in a certain way. Due to the number of assumptions we have to make, our theoretical modelling phase is carried out in two discreet iterations.
|
03 |
CAD, CFD & FEAOnce the blade geometries have been generated, the virtual assembly starts taking form using all information gathered so far. The creation of the 3D models is followed by a computational analysis is some cases. For structural purposes, a bit part of our work focuses on modelling the behaviour of 3D-printed plastics, whereas for flow evaluation and optimisation, packages such as ANSYS Fluent are used.
|
04 |
Optimisation for 3D Printing & AssemblySatisfying the theoretical model is one thing, but making sure everything can be manufactured and assembled is a whole different story. Once individual sub-teams have handed over their design, this is joined with the rest of the engine and every part is reviewed to make sure it can be 3D-printed with ease. Often smaller sections or key connections are prototyped to ensure the parts will have the right fit. Virtual assembly is concluded by adding all auxiliary parts, including electronics, cables, tubing, etc to ensure no critical interferences exist.
|
05 |
3D PrintingWith everything checked and ready to go, the printing queue is sorted by priority, material and colour. As every engine has more than 260 3D-printed parts, it usually takes us 3-4 months to go through the entire queue. Between the X-Plorer 1 and the X-Plorer 1 EC, our average success rate for 3D prints is 87.3% and even though by the end of it, it can be an exhausting process, it is also hugely rewarding as the actual engine is being assembled. During the process, the electronics circuit is also being built and checked.
|
06 |
TestingThe moment we are always waiting for! Testing the engine requires an external compressed air supply. Even though there are multiple 3D-printed jet engine models out there, the X-Plorer 1 was the first one ever to feature and integrated monitoring system! Novelty aside, it is extremely useful during testing as it allows us to gather performance data and identify weaknesses. We have already demonstrated that by implemented design changes in the EC which were driven by the XP1 testing data.
|
Our story so far has been full of unknowns, despite being a highly successful one. We explored the capabilities of an organisation like ours, we explored what our team can do and we are still exploring. The quest for the full potential of this project continues and we are learning more about its capabilities and engage more and more students along the way.
The X-Plorer 1 is our first project and was completed in April 2017. As of October 2018 it remains operational, as we attempt to push it further than ever before to better understand its limits. |
EC stands for extended capabilities and demonstrates these by being the first of our engines to be developed specifically for research. The EC entered development in January 2018, followed by prototyping between March and September of the same year.
The X-Plorer 1 EC was completed in October 2018 and was delivered to the Rolls-Royce Control & Monitoring Systems UTC at the University of Sheffield later that month. It remains operational and currently supports research in wireless sensing and health monitoring/fault detection systems. |
It is without doubt that the X-Plorer 1 was a huge success! But we learned so much in the 2 and a half year process of developing it, that it would be wasted to not put it to good use.
The X-Plorer 2 is much more than a successor of the first version. It features a slightly larger core, a higher bypass ratio reaching 7:1, more efficient fan blades and LP turbine stages, thrust reversal and more! It is set to be a design-only project, which has currently been suspended due to the heavy workload for Kronos and some additional difficulties of remote working. |
One of the things that make jet engines such an exciting machine for many of us is the thrust that they produce. No such better example than a low bypass turbofan designed to balance cruising and combat performance for use in a fighter jet.
Plans for the design of Kronos were introduced in September 2017 and its development was led by a dedicated team in 2017/2018, before the teams were merged based on their domain. It is an ongoing project and is set for completion by the end of 2020. |
The Project |
The People |
|